What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The Republican’s Faux War on Women

Like most conservatives and libertarians I know, the majority of my friends are liberals and leftists of one stripe or another. Since the arrival of Facebook and my begrudging acceptance of social media, this means that I am regularly presented with liberal views of one sort or another and varying degrees of offensiveness. Since I have this journal for my own political thoughts, I use it to explore political and social issues, leaving Facebook for cat and kid photos and George Takei posts. I don’t comment or block anything my liberal friends post, no matter how much I might disagree with it, I just let it pass and within a few hours it disappears. What this process does is allow me stay in touch with people who might be offended

Let’s face it: social media is a terrible place to discuss or debate ideas. Most issues can’t be condensed into a Facebook post with a ‘read more’ tag beneath it, let alone a Twitter post. Federal spending in 140 chars or less. OMG! U suk! FTW!

The process is good for a political writer. It’s good because it keeps me abreast of the liberal zeitgeist from my perch out her in Exile and provides mental fodder for posts here.

The big topic among my friends is Senator-wanna-be Todd Akin’s “legitimate rape” comments and how they support their belief in the GOP’s War on Women™. A long time ago I remember watching the GOP get all hot and bothered over flag burning. President George HW Bush said, “Flag burning is wrong. I believe the importance of this issue compels me to call for a constitutional amendment.” It fired up the base and gave them something else to rally around instead of Bush’s record which, in 1992, wasn’t all that much to tout.

I don’t think Obama is Bush I – I think he is far, far worse – more Nixon than anything. But he and his team are employing the same tactic obfuscate his terrible economic track record with the War on Women™. Let’s look at the components of this war. There are several specific efforts cited by Democrats as exemplifying the War which can be boiled down to the following points: the GOP platform banning abortion in all circumstances including rape or incest. This is the same wording that has been in the platform since 2004. Prior to that the platform was much less restrictive on the procedure. Second, attempts in Congress to de-fund Planned Parenthood and eliminate federal funds for family planning.

I don’t pay attention to party conventions for the simple reason that I’ve always thought they were pointless. So when my liberal friends became up in arms over the GOP party platform, I had to look it up. Honestly it’s easier to find pictures of dancing cats than it is to find actual platform text. Walter Russell Mead gives a withering critique of party conventions and platforms.

...the honest truth is that no party platform means anything in American politics anymore. No president refers back to the platform in framing legislation, no congressional leader uses it to set the legislative agenda, no living soul ever reads or quotes it for any purpose whatever. No historian of American party politics goes back to study them, no journalist refers to them more than a week after the convention. They are dead letters, produced out of a sense of ritual and to the extent they have any purpose whatever, they are idle playgrounds aimed at keeping clueless party zealots busy counting coup and scoring imaginary points.Party counts for very little in America today, and their platforms count for even less. Presidential candidates don’t feel bound by them in the slightest, and they shouldn’t.

The GOP platform is completely worthless. It excites zealots – both GOP and Democrat – and that’s what it did among my liberal friends.

As for Planned Parenthood, the organization was founded during the eugenics movement of the early 20th century, particularly of the racist variety. Since the ethnic stock I derive from was at various times the target of such a movement, I’m not a fan. I’m sure the KKK does some good, but given PP’s founding steeped in eugenics and racism, and the organizations continued flirtation with racism today, and I’m happy not seeing my tax dollars going to fund the organization. If people want to fund Planned Parenthood or the Klan, that’s their business but it shouldn’t be the federal government’s.

 

All the other examples of the supposed War are MoveOn.org talking points such as H.R. 358 which the organization claims

5) In Congress, Republicans have a bill that would let hospitals allow a woman to die rather than perform an abortion necessary to save her life.

Unfortunately, that’s not what the bill says.
IN GENERAL- No funds authorized or appropriated by this Act (or an amendment made by this Act), including credits applied toward qualified health plans under section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or cost-sharing reductions under section 1402 of this Act, may be used to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion, except
‘(A) if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest; or

‘(B) in the case where a pregnant female suffers from a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness that would, as certified by a physician, place the female in danger of death unless an abortion is performed, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself.


(emph. add.)

What rankles the anti-Life crusaders is the lack of language forcing a Catholic hospital or a doctor opposed to abortion to go against their moral convictions or a transfer the woman to a hospital where the procedure could take place. But that’s not the intent of the bill. The bill covers appropriation of taxpayer dollars: it has to do with payment for the procedure, and in the case where the woman’s life is endangered, the bill authorizes such payment.

And look at the details of the case: a woman dying who can only be saved by the murder of her unborn child / excision of the fetus who is receiving care by an institution or doctors who believe it is immoral for them to harm the child/fetus. How often do such cases occur, and is it appropriate for a law to exist to cover each possible exception? This is one reason why I support legal abortion even though I am morally opposed to it. A government cannot possible create laws that cover every possible contingency without hurting someone. Yet failing to create such a contingency becomes ammunition in support of the GOP’s War on Women?

Such a run to turn an extreme event into a is common the Left, from claiming the Tea Party had blood on its hands over the Gabby Giffords shooting (perpetrated by a lunatic leftist) [h/t TheRightPlanet] to Todd Akin’s statements, where the entire Republican Party broke the sound barrier distancing themselves from his comments, to no avail from the Obama administration echo chamber in the media which pounced and portrayed every Republican as a religious zealot.

Judging by the social media comments of my liberal friends I notice that some of the same people claiming the moral high ground over the Akin episode also support Julian Assange, accused of rape in Sweden. Instead of rallying around his accusers in Sweden (both women) they cheer Assange’s flight from facing justice in the bastion of socialism often trumpeted by the Left as a moral example – except when it comes to rape then suddenly Sweden is Louisiana just with better looking rednecks I suppose. What about his accusers rights to justice? Where is the moral outrage for two women who may have been actually raped versus Akin’s statements in which no woman was harmed?

I have discussed cognitive dissonance, or the holding two opposite and conflicting opinions throughout this journal, but I’m still amazed when I see it at work among people whom I would consider otherwise intelligent. The malady is insidious, and we all must regularly question our own beliefs, especially our most deeply held, to prevent falling into its trap.

As Charles Krauthammer noted, “If you vote for Romney he will kill your mother with cancer, throw your dad out of work, prevent your sister from getting contraceptives and kick your son out of college.” There are plenty of reasons not to vote for the GOP candidate this year, but the War on Women shouldn’t be one of them.

No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)

24 Comments

  1. Jack:

    Scott, when it comes to cognitive dissonance, I would like you to remember your comments that the GOP platform is meaningless the next time you attack the Democratic platform. Every blog I’ve ever read, and every pundit I’ve ever heard, does exactly that; will flip sides of the argument as necessary to support their views. And both sides are guilty of inflaming things way out of proportion. Remember only a few years ago the phrase “death panels”. I remember the whole frenzy around “death panels” was dropped the instant the legislation went through. That was an obvious sign it was nothing more than hyperbole, and everyone knew it.

    I see that many of your essays are simply a tit-for-tat commentary. It seems to often boil down to “they attack this person but they support that person—what hypocrites!”

    But it is fun to chuckle along. 🙂

  2. Scott Kirwin:

    Jack
    I’m unaware of what’s in the Democratic platform, and I’m not going to waste my time researching it. I doubt I’ve ever commented on it but if I have, I blame all the pot I smoked in my teens.

    Honestly the whole platform thing bores me. I only bring it up because it was thrown up to me last week by a FB friend who was trying to make Romney into Akin. “You know Scott Mr Romney has sought the role as republican nominee for president. He is in the media and meeting with people representing himself to them as the representative of that party and Its ideals. And for the time being especially during an election environment then I say yes he is speaking for the party he purports to represent.” I had equated Abortion on the Left with Guns on the Right as being issues that fired up the bases; well it worked: she was fired up all right.

    Yes many of my essays are tit-for-tat, but their tits are bigger than my tats. Or is it the other way around? At my age it just might be. My tat might be Akin. Akin is an extremist, but so is Obama. Akin has snowball in hell’s chance at becoming a Senator. Obama has a good shot of ruling for another 4 years.

    While I still have respect for the Democratic Party (I was one up until 2004 and voted for such winners as Gore, Dukakis and Mondale for chrissakes), I don’t like Obama, Jack. I don’t like the secrets he’s been allowed to keep by a lap-dog media (sealed transcripts, sealed thesis, sealed student evaluations). I don’t like how he has blamed previous administrations for every bad thing and taken credit for every good thing. I don’t like how he has shamed his enemies in public, like the time he castigated the Supremes in his SOTU address, and encouraged America’s enemies abroad. I don’t like how he’s submitted budgets that weren’t seriously proposed, that end up being voted down unanimously in Congress by both parties. I don’t like how he’s doubled the national debt, making it likely that my son won’t experience a better standard of living than me. I don’t like how he outsourced Obamacare to congress, and blames the GOP for his leadership failure. I think he’s a narcissist in the mold of Jimmy Carter and Woodrow Wilson who cares not a jot about anything but his own legacy. I could go on, and on but won’t bore you because you are a fan. In short I think he’s the Democratic Nixon. And I still hate the GOP version in case you are wondering.

    I’m not hot on Romney. I’d much rather have seen Chris Christie. But my experience with Mormons leads me to believe that his faith is a help not a hindrance; while I’m not a fan of their religion, it does seem to produce some decent, hardworking people (even Harry Reid when he’s not blowing smoke out of his ass). Romney is sincere, and what you see is what you get. I fully expect the Press to return to its duty of keeping the Executive branch honest after the GOP take power, something they haven’t done since Obama took office. Hell, I expect standup comedians will be able to start making fun of the president again improving Comedy Central.

    This journal would have been a lot lighter with another Clinton in the White House. I still like Bill even if he was a weasel and never bought into the Clinton hatred of the hard-core right. But Obama? I used to think he was a Jimmy Carter. Now I’m convinced he’s Nixon.

  3. Watcher of Weasels » Watcher’s Council Nominations – Empty Chair Edition:

    [...] Dilemma Of Jewish Democrats And This Year’s Anti-Israel Party Platform The Razor – What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The RepublicanÂ’s Faux War on Women The Right Planet – Plutocracy of the Damned (Part 1) Bookworm Room – The New York Times presents [...]

  4. This Week’s Watcher’s Council Nominations – Empty Chair Edition | therightplanet.com:

    [...] The Razor – What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The Republican?s Faux War on Women [...]

  5. This Week’s Watcher’s Council Nominations | therightplanet.com:

    [...] The Razor – What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The Republican?s Faux War on Women [...]

  6. Watcher’s Council Nominations – Empty Chair Edition | Virginia Right!:

    [...] The Razor – What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The RepublicanÂ’s Faux War on Women [...]

  7. Watcher’s Council Nominations – Empty Chair Edition | Independent Sentinel:

    [...] The Razor – What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The RepublicanÂ’s Faux War on Women [...]

  8. GayPatriot » Watcher of Weasels Nominations — 8th Blogiversary Edition:

    [...] The Razor – What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The RepublicanÂ’s Faux War on Women [...]

  9. Trevor Loudon's New Zeal Blog:

    [...] The Razor – What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The RepublicanÂ’s Faux War on Women [...]

  10. Watcher’s Council Nominations: Empty Chair Edition « TinaTrent.com:

    [...] The Razor – What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The Republican?s Faux War on Women [...]

  11. Watcher’s Council Nominations – Empty Chair Edition | askmarion:

    [...] The Razor – What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The Republican’s Faux War on Women [...]

  12. Bookworm Room » This week’s Watcher’s Council submissions:

    [...] The Razor – What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The RepublicanÂ’s Faux War on Women [...]

  13. A Conventional Convention |:

    [...] The Razor – What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The RepublicanÂ’s Faux War on Women [...]

  14. Sara:

    Obama is Nixon and Carter combined. I am pro-abortion but I find myself horrified by the idea that they are making this into a woman’s right when they talk about aborting a baby up until the moment of birth. That is too much for me. The faux war on women is working with the young women who listen to sound bites.

  15. Watcher of Weasels » The Council Has Spoken!! This Week’s Watcher’s Council Results:

    [...] [...]

  16. The Council Has Spoken!! This Week’s Watcher’s Council Results | Virginia Right!:

    [...] Third place t with 1 1/3 vote – The Razor- What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The Republican’s Faux War on Women [...]

  17. This Week’s Watcher’s Council Results | therightplanet.com:

    [...] Third place t with 1 1/3 vote – The Razor- What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The Republican’s Faux War on Women [...]

  18. Trevor Loudon's New Zeal Blog:

    [...] Third place t with 1 1/3 vote – The Razor – What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The Republican’s Faux War on Women [...]

  19. Bookworm Room » Watcher’s Council winners for September 7, 2012:

    [...] Third place t with 1 1/3 vote – The Razor- What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The Republican’s Faux War on Women [...]

  20. The Council Has Spoken! This Week’s Watcher’s Council Results | Independent Sentinel:

    [...] Third place t with 1 1/3 vote – The Razor- What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The Republican’s Faux War on Women [...]

  21. The Council Has Spoken!! This Week’s Watcher’s Council Results | askmarion:

    [...] Third place t with 1 1/3 vote – The Razor- What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The Republican’s Faux War on Women [...]

  22. Get ‘Yer Stories |:

    [...] Third place t with 1 1/3 vote – The Razor- What If They Gave a War and Nobody Came? The Republican’s Faux War on Women [...]

  23. ruralcounsel:

    We should all remember that in the War on Women, the Democrats have Ted Kennedy – the only one with a confirmed kill.

  24. Scott Kirwin:

    (clap)(clap) Well played sir, well played. 🙂

Leave a comment