The Twisted Memory of Newt Gingrich

The campaign for the 2012 Republican Party nomination began the moment after Sen. John McCain’s concession speech. One of the benefits of writing a blog over 10 years, and being political sentient over an additional 30,  is memory. In many areas, personal relationships for example, memory is a curse. It is better to forget the stupid thing your brother said to you when you were a teenager or the faux pas your wife made at dinner with your parents before you married than to remember them. Relationships would last if memories were like the tapes (or now, computer chips) in black boxes that are 100% accurate for a given period of time and are completely erased as time progresses. But in politics a clear memory of events and statements in the past can help one judge politicians by their actions not their words.

Memory is one of the most important issues today in the contest for the GOP nomination. Was Romney a Democrat in 1992? Was Gingrich a Reaganite in the 1980s? These questions and many similar ones have been thrown like firecrackers at the feet of each candidate, forcing him to dodge or misstep, putting him off balance but not doing any irreparable harm. We have seen grainy analog video on our digital HD television and computer screens from a bygone era, thrown at the opposing candidates as if we were supposed to draw lessons about them today. But the only lesson I can draw is non-HD video really, truly stunk and I’m left wondering how we tolerated it without ruining our eyesight. My memories of that age are just as fuzzy but for a variety of different, biological reasons:  becoming a parent. That event degrades the memory quickly, turning bright past experiences into pale shadows just glimpsed when uttering phrases like, “When I was your age…”

Honestly, does it matter if Romney wasn’t a Republican in 1992? Not to me because I wasn’t a Republican in 1992 either. As for Newt Gingrich, I didn’t like him in 1996 and gee, here I am 16 years later and I still don’t like him – but for different reasons. Back then I thought it was a blowhard desperate for power and willing to do and say anything to achieve it. I still believe that, only now I’m a card-carrying Republican and conservative instead of the opposite back then. Yes, I changed but apparently Newt has not. Evidently I wasn’t alone in feeling that way. The fact that he lost his speakership after a GOP revolt by his own members says it all. They revolted against him because people didn’t like him even then, and looking at the recent polls, again, things haven’t changed that much.

Now don’t get me wrong. I love watching him debate. If we were voting for the head of the national debate team in November he would definitely get my vote. Newt knows rhetoric and has a solid grasp of ancient and modern history – just not his own or his party’s. But we aren’t voting for the head of a debate team; we are voting for president and most Americans don’t watch the debates, don’t care about them, and will not allow their votes to be swayed by them. They will instead vote for the guy they like best. If Gingrich is one of the pair of guys they have to choose, he will lose because people simply don’t like Newt Gingrich.

Even conservatives don’t like Newt Gingrich. I nearly choked last summer upon seeing Newt call Congressman Paul Ryan’s budget “right wing social engineering,” and I haven’t like his recent leftist-style attacks on Romney’s wealth and taxes either. Newt hijacked these leftist talking points because he’s an opportunist and didn’t mind using the enemy’s rhetorical guns to shoot at Romney. As a gun owner I won’t buy an AK-47 for the very reason I find owning one immoral because it has sent too many of my countrymen to early graves. Gingrich showed no such tact by grabbing the argumentative equivalent of the AK-47 and used it against his fellow Republican. As someone who remembers (and still admires) Lee Atwater, I realize Reagan’s 11th Commandment not to attack fellow Republicans was more of a guideline than a moral stricture back then, but seeing Newt attack Romney with the leftist logic just brought up all those old memories of the 1990s. I might not be the liberal I was back then, but I still know a weasel when I see one.

In his Commentary piece, Peter Wehner points out the red-on-red attacks the Gingrich candidacy has wrought. “If you’re for Gingrich, so goes this story line, you’re for “genuine” and “fundamental” change. If you oppose Gingrich, on the other hand, you’re for “managing the decay” of America,” Wehner writes. I like Sarah Palin, but seeing her back Newt makes me wonder if I have misjudged her. Watching Newt attempt to seduce the Tea Party with his small government rhetoric is downright embarrassing to those of us who remember the expansion of the federal government under his watch. Did we live in the same era as Newt? Are we talking about the same reality – or has the current Gingrich slipped from another dimension where the former house speaker really did fight to reduce the scope of the federal government? It is definitely not the one I remember from the 1990s.

I would love to see Gingrich as the Republican equivalent of Winston Churchill: erudite, witty, stoic and persevering. I would enjoy seeing Newt school Obama and his minions in the press from now until Election Day in debates as well as on the stump. But Gingrich isn’t Churchill, and he sure isn’t Ronald Reagan. He has shown an Obama-like willingness to use any weapon at his disposal against his potential allies, an insatiable desire to pal around with liberals (see his appearances with Pelosi, Sharpton, et al), and a callous disregard for conservative values and the party that strives to fulfill them.



No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)


  1. Watcher of Weasels » Watcher’s Council Nominations – Florida Showdown Edition:

    [...] York Bookworm Room – ObamaCare, the Catholic Church, and mandatory abortion paymentsThe Razor – The Twisted Memory of Newt Gingrich Rhymes With Right – Presidents Are Not Kings; Americans No Obliged To Appear When He Beckons Right [...]

  2. This Week’s Watcher’s Council Results |

    [...] The Razor – The Twisted Memory of Newt Gingrich [...]

  3. This Week’s Watcher’s Council Nominations |

    [...] The Razor – The Twisted Memory of Newt Gingrich [...]

  4. » Blog Archive » Watcher’s Council Nominations – Florida Showdown Edition:

    [...] The Razor – The Twisted Memory of Newt Gingrich [...]

  5. Trevor Loudon's New Zeal Blog » Watcher’s Council Nominations – Florida Showdown Edition:

    [...] The Razor – The Twisted Memory of Newt Gingrich [...]

  6. Romney Wins Florida Primary by Double Digits – Time for the GOP Mudfest to Stop!?! Plus Florida Showdown Watchers Council Nomination Edition | askmarion:

    [...] The Razor – The Twisted Memory of Newt Gingrich [...]

  7. Like Groundhog Day |:

    [...] The Razor – The Twisted Memory of Newt Gingrich [...]

  8. Watcher’s Council Nominations – Florida Showdown Edition | Virginia Right!:

    [...] The Razor – The Twisted Memory of Newt Gingrich [...]

  9. Bookworm Room » The usual wonderful mix of stuff from the Watcher’s Council:

    [...] The Razor – The Twisted Memory of Newt Gingrich [...]

  10. Watcher’s Council Nominations – Florida Showdown Edition | Independent Sentinel:

    [...] The Razor – The Twisted Memory of Newt Gingrich [...]

  11. Watcher of Weasels » The Council Has Spoken!! This Week’s Watcher’s Council Results:

    [...] [...]

  12. This Week’s Watcher’s Council Results |

    [...] Third place with 2 1/3 votes – The Razor-The Twisted Memory of Newt Gingrich [...]

  13. ligneus:

    Newt was running a high minded campaign until Mitt dumped on him in Iowa with millions of dollars worth of negative, some of it false, ads. Same in Florida, $17m in almost all negative ads.

  14. » Blog Archive » The Council Has Spoken!! This Week’s Watcher’s Council Results – 02/03/12:

    [...] Third place with 2 1/3 votes – The Razor – The Twisted Memory of Newt Gingrich [...]

  15. ligneus:

    And do check out this list.

  16. Trevor Loudon's New Zeal Blog » The Council Has Spoken!! This Week’s Watcher’s Council Results – 02/03/12:

    [...] Third place with 2 1/3 votes – The Razor – The Twisted Memory of Newt Gingrich [...]

  17. Scott Kirwin:

    Yep. Mitt went negative in SC - just as Bush did on McCain in 00, McCain did on Mitt in 08. I don’t like it but as an admirer of Lee Atwater I recognize that it works. My problem with Newt isn’t what Romney says – it’s what Newt says. Watching him wrap himself in the Tea Party’s Gadsden flag has to be one of the most bizarre political escapades I’ve witnessed in my time. Almost as kookie as Dukakis in the tank – almost…

  18. ligneus:

    But Newt, like Reagan, was always a bit of an outsider which is why he got into trouble as Speaker, he upset the establishment guys, just as he’s doing now, so in that sense, in the absence of anyone more ‘teapartyish’ he’s a good fit for them.And don’t forget his record, first Rep Congress for fifty years, balanced budget, entitlement reform etc. Romney’s just too establisment, too much the same old like Dole and McCain who both lost.

  19. ligneus:

    You know there an awful lot of people like this:
    Romney has poisoned the well.
    See also this from the same site:

  20. ligneus:

  21. ligneus:

    Mitt’s comment on not being worried about the poor and what he should have said. This guy could lose to Obama.

  22. Scott Kirwin:

    If Gingrich can’t handle Romney’s negative attacks, I have serious doubts that he could survive the s**tstorm being planned by Obama’s proxies. I’m glad Romney knows how to punch below the belt. McCain took the high road in 08, and look where that got him.
    Newt has shown he has a glass jaw. He simply can’t withstand negative attacks. Is that fair? No, but all I care about is beating Obama in Nov.

  23. A Super Bowl Winner |:

    [...] Third place with 2 1/3 votes – The Razor-The Twisted Memory of Newt Gingrich [...]

  24. ligneus:

    You’re no doubt right. Stephen Hayward has a good post on the subject.

  25. ligneus:

    There is however a huge divide in the two wings of the Republican party and it needs to be dealt with.

  26. Bookworm Room » Watcher’s Council results for February 3, 2012:

    [...] Third place with 2 1/3 votes – The Razor-The Twisted Memory of Newt Gingrich [...]

  27. ligneus:

    Sorry to be a bit of a troll here, but if Prof Jacobson is right Romney is doing damage to the Rep party.

  28. Scott Kirwin:

    I suppose it’s possible. But how long-lasting is that damage? Consider what Bush did to McCain in South Carolina in 2000. That was far worse if memory serves than what Romney has done.

    Yes Romney may have suppressed the GOP primary vote. What would a similar carpet bombing strategy do to Democrats? McCain tried the higher road strategy in 08, and look what it netted him.

    I want someone who is willing to bring a gun to a knife fight. I want someone who is willing to street brawl. Personally I think that Romney is a moderate, but after 4 years under an extremist I could use a little moderation right now. Would I prefer a Tea Party president? Absolutely. But America won’t elect one – at least not this year.

    Of course things are so loopy right now that I suppose anything is possible.

Leave a comment